Your neighbor is sentient and capable of suffering, whereas a fetus is not.
Your neighbor is a sentient autonomous person who is not violating your bodily autonomy.
A fetus is a non-sentient non-autonomous non-person who IS violating your bodily autonomy if you don’t want it there.
It’s more of like if I’m having sex and I tell my partner to stop. If they continue, they are violating my bodily autonomy, and if violence is needed in order to get them to stop, then that is completely justified violence.
If I say I don’t want to be pregnant, obviously the fetus isn’t going to stop. By continuing to use my body without my consent, it is violating my bodily autonomy. And if the only way to get it to stop is to kill it, then that is justified.
How can you be violent towards something that is incapable of suffering?
If you’re dying right next to me and need an organ of mine to live, I DONT have to give it to you. You, a sentient autonomous born person, cannot use my body without my consent. So why the *fuck* should a non-sentient non-autonomous unborn *fetus* get to do so?
..they’re like “I’m giving you Beyoncé in 1984, on the beach, eating ice cream, during a thunderstorm.” And it’s so convincing, I’ll be like “I see that!”
the year is 2014 AD. the human race has existed for over 200,000 years. men still think women pee out of the vagina.
neither do a lot of women